Don’t force your talented youngsters to choose from an early age, says John O’Sullivan – playing other sports can make them more rounded individuals.
The greatest difference between our children’s sporting experience, and our own, is the rise of year-round, sport-specific clubs that ask, or even require, season after season of participation, in order to stay in the player development pipeline.
The pressure to have your child specialize in a single sport at a young age has never been stronger. As a result, parents ask me all the time: “When should my child specialize in one sport?”.
In fact, I get asked this so often I wrote an entire eBook on it: Is It Wise To Specialize?.
When I tell them the science says to wait, many tell me: "That’s not possible. If my child does not specialize early, she will be left out, not make the high-school team and have no chance of playing in college."
They tell me about coaches who have told them their child needs 10,000 hours of organized, structured practice, and of their fear that other kids will be getting a leg up if their child does not specialize. They are stuck in a downward spiral, detrimental to their children, but feel helpless to change course.
Kirk Anderson, former director of coach education for the US Tennis Association, once said: "Even if parents know and understand age-appropriate principles for children, they would be reluctant to accept them, because they fear their child would fall behind the kid in a more structured program which focuses on training, competition and deliberate practice."
This fear force kids into sports that, often, are not of their choosing; and, in many cases, compels them to remain in activities that are not enjoyable or intrinsically motivating, nor congruent with their athletic abilities.
This path fails to consider many of the physical, emotional and social costs to children who only play a single sport.
There is a different path. It is the one based in science, psychology and best practices of athletic development. It is one that serves the needs of children for a lifetime, reduces injuries and burnout, increases enjoyment and motivation, and produces better athletes. It is the path of multiple sport participation and less structured play.
But don’t just take my word for it.
In this article are some facts and statistics from various sources that should make every parent think twice about early specialization in soccer and other sports, where athletes typically peak in their 20s.
An additional thought is provided by top youth sports researchers Jean Cote and Jessica Fraser-Thomas, who suggest that at no time should a young athlete participate year-round in a single sport.
While they recommend that athletes in sports whose competitors peak after age 20 need to accumulate around 10,000 hours of general sports participation, no more than half of that needs to be deliberate practice of their chosen sport.
As a general rule, they recommend the following age breakdown for athletes trying to achieve elite status in a specific sport:
But how do you approach people with this information?
Every adult involved in youth sports will come up against people who advocate for single-sport specialization.
Some think their child is the next Tiger Woods, Venus Williams, Lionel Messi or Megan Rapinoe, so are getting in their 10,000 hours. Others are afraid to go against the grain, and fear they are disadvantaging their own child by not specializing.
I meet these folks, too, and I blind them with the science. I then ask for the data and research that supports their theory. Cue the cricket noises, because it does not exist.
If you know these folks, direct them to this article. Send it to your club director and your coach, who thinks you should skip Grandma’s 90th birthday because your U11s team has their fourth tournament of the summer that weekend – an actual call I took, by the way.
Of course, this will not work all the time – or even most of the time. After all, despite an abundance of science on the hazards of smoking, it has little impact on some.
At some point, parents need to ask themselves: "Does my 10-year-old really need to keep playing 11-and-a-half months of soccer a year in order to have a chance of success? Am I really doing him or her a disservice by making them play multiple sports and trying to help them find one she is passionate about?".
I think we are ready for an alternative. I think people are sick of 11 straight months of 6am trips to the ice hockey rink, or weekend after weekend of expensive out-of-town soccer tournaments for ’elite’ 11-year-olds. I know I am not alone in thinking this.
The best sports psychology is on our side. The best research into athletic development and physiology is on our side. The top minds in sports medicine are on our side.
Aligned against us are a few who stand to profit from promoting the mythology surrounding single-sport specialization.
They are not scientists. They are not researchers. They are not top coaching minds. They are profiteers, often backed by parents and coaches living out their own unfulfilled sports dreams through the children.
I like the company I am keeping these days. For the sake of our kids, I hope you will join me.
In a recent survey 89% of subscribers said Soccer Coach Weekly makes them more confident, 91% said Soccer Coach Weekly makes them a more effective coach and 93% said Soccer Coach Weekly makes them more inspired.
*includes 3 coaching manuals
Get Weekly Inspiration
All the latest techniques and approaches
Soccer Coach Weekly offers proven and easy to use soccer drills, coaching sessions, practice plans, small-sided games, warm-ups, training tips and advice.
We've been at the cutting edge of soccer coaching since we launched in 2007, creating resources for the grassroots youth coach, following best practice from around the world and insights from the professional game.